Is Myers Briggs scientifically valid

In the pharmaceutical industry, many.For example, in myers and briggs' thinking, a person is either an extravert or an introvert.Some research suggests the mbti is unreliable because the same person can get different results when retaking the test.Katharine briggs and her daughter, isabel briggs myers, developed jung's theory and the first forms of the instrument, sharing a vision to enable individuals to grow through an understanding and appreciation of individual differences in healthy.In other words, there is an aspect of validation that falls within these terms.

For the mbti, the evidence says not very, no, no and not.Maybe that explains why it is so popular yet meaningless in terms of science and research.(see the standards for educational and psychological testing 1999, or messick, 1989).That being said, the myers briggs is not a scientifically valid personality assessment.However, personality assessments can be validated for specific purposes.

Drawing on carl jung's personality type theory and subsequent work of isabelle briggs myers, the myers briggs typology sorts people into one of 16 personality types, based on their natural predispositions for processing information, making decisions, relating to others, and generally approaching life.Reliability and validity problems with the mbti assessment.Jung, who first wrote about psychological type in his groundbreaking 1921 work, psychological types.The mbti test failed to be both reliable and valid.